Editing User talk:Eighty5cacao/misc/WMG dump/archive

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 37: Line 37:
 
[http://ia700808.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.cand.248875/gov.uscourts.cand.248875.14.0.pdf This PDF] explains how Universal Music Group uses the Copyrobeast. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 10:12, 16 December 2011 (MST)
 
[http://ia700808.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.cand.248875/gov.uscourts.cand.248875.14.0.pdf This PDF] explains how Universal Music Group uses the Copyrobeast. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 10:12, 16 December 2011 (MST)
 
:Ok, thanks for the good info; preparing response. (No, I haven't been compromised by a spambot.) [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 11:02, 16 December 2011 (MST)
 
:Ok, thanks for the good info; preparing response. (No, I haven't been compromised by a spambot.) [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 11:02, 16 December 2011 (MST)
βˆ’
::I see two main points here: 1) The party with more money tends to get its way in the court system, as you have mentioned in [//web.archive.org/web/20071211130204/www.pineight.com/rant/dmca/ an archived rant], and 2) any automated content-identification system will have false positives, which could intrude upon [[wikipedia:fair use|fair use]] and/or [[wikipedia:de minimis|de minimis]] uses. What if Content ID finds three strikes and bans an user before s/he has time to plead (fair use|authorized use|...)? The risk is especially great since YouTube bans often lead to a full suspension of the associated Google Account.
+
::I see two main points here: 1) The party with more money tends to get its way in the court system, as you have mentioned in [http://web.archive.org/web/20071211130204/www.pineight.com/rant/dmca/ an archived rant], and 2) any automated content-identification system will have false positives, which could intrude upon [[wikipedia:fair use|fair use]] and/or [[wikipedia:de minimis|de minimis]] uses. What if Content ID finds three strikes and bans an user before s/he has time to plead (fair use|authorized use|...)? The risk is especially great since YouTube bans often lead to a full suspension of the associated Google Account.
 
::So what does all this have to do with Magibon?<!-- This is a "rhetorical question"; I do not need an answer from you. --> In the majority of Magibon's videos, there is nothing copyrightable (though future lawyers, and future versions of Content ID, might disagree whether [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVjZVxhrlVk ''Brain Age'' in this video] satisfies ''de minimis''). However, both the Content ID bot and the courts are growing ever more aggressive. Currently, Magibon is doing the only thing safe to do on YouTube: nothing. However, her interpretation of "nothing" may not be safe forever; if she gets banhammered (i.e. "defeated by the Copyrobeast") then we're really all doomed. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 11:58, 18 December 2011 (MST) (last edit 10:04, 19 December 2011 (MST))
 
::So what does all this have to do with Magibon?<!-- This is a "rhetorical question"; I do not need an answer from you. --> In the majority of Magibon's videos, there is nothing copyrightable (though future lawyers, and future versions of Content ID, might disagree whether [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVjZVxhrlVk ''Brain Age'' in this video] satisfies ''de minimis''). However, both the Content ID bot and the courts are growing ever more aggressive. Currently, Magibon is doing the only thing safe to do on YouTube: nothing. However, her interpretation of "nothing" may not be safe forever; if she gets banhammered (i.e. "defeated by the Copyrobeast") then we're really all doomed. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 11:58, 18 December 2011 (MST) (last edit 10:04, 19 December 2011 (MST))
 
::In other words: As far as is publicly known, Magibon's primary (steady) source of income is her YouTube Partnership rather than a real job. Thus a lot of people believe something is wrong with her psychologically. Some have called her an "[https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080209211444AAaBUzy immature child]" &mdash; which she is not, since she is doing the only smart thing that can be done on YouTube (that is, nothing). If the Copyrobeast attacks Magibon, [[wikipedia:Alien vs. Predator (film)|whoever wins... we lose]], um, I mean it's a lose-lose situation. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 00:26, 8 January 2012 (MST)
 
::In other words: As far as is publicly known, Magibon's primary (steady) source of income is her YouTube Partnership rather than a real job. Thus a lot of people believe something is wrong with her psychologically. Some have called her an "[https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080209211444AAaBUzy immature child]" &mdash; which she is not, since she is doing the only smart thing that can be done on YouTube (that is, nothing). If the Copyrobeast attacks Magibon, [[wikipedia:Alien vs. Predator (film)|whoever wins... we lose]], um, I mean it's a lose-lose situation. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 00:26, 8 January 2012 (MST)

Please note that all contributions to Pin Eight are considered to be released under the Attribution 3.0 Unported (see Pin Eight:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)