Difference between revisions of "Talk:HTML5 vs. SWF"

From Pin Eight
Jump to: navigation, search
(wikipedia:Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: yet again sorry for not doing my homework)
(Google Chrome Frame to be bundled with Google Toolbar for IE: new section)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:Per [[Wikipedia:WP:FOOTERS]]: "See also" is for internal links not integrated into prose. "References" is for works actually cited in the article, whether through Cite.php or otherwise. This leaves "External links" for any WP/Trope links not integrated into prose, as was done in [[Trousers]]. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 06:57, 23 January 2012 (MST)
 
:Per [[Wikipedia:WP:FOOTERS]]: "See also" is for internal links not integrated into prose. "References" is for works actually cited in the article, whether through Cite.php or otherwise. This leaves "External links" for any WP/Trope links not integrated into prose, as was done in [[Trousers]]. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 06:57, 23 January 2012 (MST)
 
::Ah, ok. That's one part of the MOS I hadn't studied closely enough yet. Also, I keep forgetting that Wikipedia is "external" even though it has an "interwiki" link. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 11:19, 23 January 2012 (MST)
 
::Ah, ok. That's one part of the MOS I hadn't studied closely enough yet. Also, I keep forgetting that Wikipedia is "external" even though it has an "interwiki" link. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 11:19, 23 January 2012 (MST)
 +
 +
== Google Chrome Frame to be bundled with Google Toolbar for IE ==
 +
 +
per [http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2012/10/chrome-frame-bundled-with-google-toolbar.html post on Google System - Unofficial Google Blog]. Is this worth mentioning anywhere? (Probably not, I acknowledge, since IT departments are unlikely to authorize the installation of Google Toolbar...) --[[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 21:31, 19 October 2012 (MST)

Revision as of 04:31, 20 October 2012

wikipedia:Comparison of HTML5 and Flash

...exists. Where could we work in a link? Does it belong in the "References" section, or should I create "See also"? Eighty5cacao 20:22, 22 January 2012 (MST)

Per Wikipedia:WP:FOOTERS: "See also" is for internal links not integrated into prose. "References" is for works actually cited in the article, whether through Cite.php or otherwise. This leaves "External links" for any WP/Trope links not integrated into prose, as was done in Trousers. --Tepples 06:57, 23 January 2012 (MST)
Ah, ok. That's one part of the MOS I hadn't studied closely enough yet. Also, I keep forgetting that Wikipedia is "external" even though it has an "interwiki" link. Eighty5cacao 11:19, 23 January 2012 (MST)

Google Chrome Frame to be bundled with Google Toolbar for IE

per post on Google System - Unofficial Google Blog. Is this worth mentioning anywhere? (Probably not, I acknowledge, since IT departments are unlikely to authorize the installation of Google Toolbar...) --Eighty5cacao 21:31, 19 October 2012 (MST)