Difference between revisions of "Pin Eight talk:Scope"

From Pin Eight
Jump to: navigation, search
(+Patent nonsense wording)
 
(Patent nonsense wording: "incoherent babble")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Patent nonsense wording ==
 
== Patent nonsense wording ==
 
Somehow, it took me a couple of seconds to remember that "patent nonsense" was not "nonsense about [[wikipedia:patent|patent]]s." Although I am a native English speaker, I can see how nonnative readers would even more likely be confused. Do you have ideas for an alternative wording? [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 12:10, 9 October 2011 (MST)
 
Somehow, it took me a couple of seconds to remember that "patent nonsense" was not "nonsense about [[wikipedia:patent|patent]]s." Although I am a native English speaker, I can see how nonnative readers would even more likely be confused. Do you have ideas for an alternative wording? [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 12:10, 9 October 2011 (MST)
 +
:Most top results for the phrase "patent nonsense" on Google appear to use a pun on the multiple meanings of "patent", as part of the title of an article about inventions: either useless inventions or corruption in the scheme of exclusive rights in these inventions. That's why I wrote "incoherent babble". --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 13:33, 9 October 2011 (MST)

Revision as of 20:33, 9 October 2011

Patent nonsense wording

Somehow, it took me a couple of seconds to remember that "patent nonsense" was not "nonsense about patents." Although I am a native English speaker, I can see how nonnative readers would even more likely be confused. Do you have ideas for an alternative wording? Eighty5cacao 12:10, 9 October 2011 (MST)

Most top results for the phrase "patent nonsense" on Google appear to use a pun on the multiple meanings of "patent", as part of the title of an article about inventions: either useless inventions or corruption in the scheme of exclusive rights in these inventions. That's why I wrote "incoherent babble". --Tepples 13:33, 9 October 2011 (MST)