Difference between revisions of "User talk:Clueless"

From Pin Eight
Jump to: navigation, search
(GBFS: Eighty5cacao pointed it out to me)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Clueless: There is no need to reply here. My original question was invalid because it turned out to be based on a misunderstanding. Sorry for any inconvenience. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 23:22, 1 March 2011 (MST)
 
Clueless: There is no need to reply here. My original question was invalid because it turned out to be based on a misunderstanding. Sorry for any inconvenience. [[User:Eighty5cacao|Eighty5cacao]] 23:22, 1 March 2011 (MST)
  
The forum post has been fixed.  Tepples, why didn't you just IM me that I bjorked it up?
+
The forum post has been fixed.  Tepples, why didn't you just IM me that I bjorked it up? <small>--unsigned post by Clueless</small>
 +
:It was Eighty5cacao who pointed it out to me (and to anyone else watching recent changes) by posting here. I too apologize for the mixup. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 07:02, 2 March 2011 (MST)

Revision as of 14:02, 2 March 2011

GBFS

You mentioned here on the NESdev forums that you came up with the idea for GBFS. If so, why is it generally credited to Tepples, and why does it use PinEightGBFS as its magic string? Have you been a member of the "Pin Eight group" for longer than I've been aware? Or is it just that you designed the general idea and Tepples did the coding?

Or were you intending to refer to a different GBFS? Eighty5cacao 20:57, 1 March 2011 (MST)

It appears to have been a bbcode fail. Look up a post or two. --Tepples 21:49, 1 March 2011 (MST)
Sorry, I mistakenly copied the URL in my address bar rather than the one of the specific post — that link should be correct.
It seems you understood me, anyway. So have I understood you: Clueless was referring to his own GBFS, which is distinct from yours. Is this right? Eighty5cacao 22:43, 1 March 2011 (MST)
Please compare Clueless's post about GBFS to the post right above it. They both contain the string "I looked at tar early in my GBA era (2001)". Clueless's post also contains the markup [/quote], which appears to be the closing tag that doesn't match an opening tag. When quoting pieces of my post, it appears Clueless forgot to add a [quote="tepples"] tag before the part that was quoted. Or to put it shorter: Clueless is referring to mine. --Tepples 23:14, 1 March 2011 (MST)

Tepples: Okay, sorry for not reading more carefully.
Clueless: There is no need to reply here. My original question was invalid because it turned out to be based on a misunderstanding. Sorry for any inconvenience. Eighty5cacao 23:22, 1 March 2011 (MST)

The forum post has been fixed. Tepples, why didn't you just IM me that I bjorked it up? --unsigned post by Clueless

It was Eighty5cacao who pointed it out to me (and to anyone else watching recent changes) by posting here. I too apologize for the mixup. --Tepples 07:02, 2 March 2011 (MST)