Difference between revisions of "Category:Mini-rants"

From Pin Eight
Jump to: navigation, search
(disclaimer - sorry I forgot to include this)
m (// for wayback machine)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''If you were looking for the old RAnT page, see [http://web.archive.org/web/20080203111050/www.pineight.com/rant/ here (Wayback Machine)] or [[User:Eighty5cacao/misc/Old RAnT|here]]. Please be aware that the contents of that page may no longer represent Damian Yerrick's current opinions.''
+
''The old RAnT page is available [//web.archive.org/web/20080203111050/www.pineight.com/rant/ through the Wayback Machine].  Damian Yerrick has been updating some of the arguments [[Mini-rant archive|here]] to take into account more recent developments in technology and policy.''
 
 
 
 
  
 
A lot of people on web forums hold common misconceptions.
 
A lot of people on web forums hold common misconceptions.
Line 8: Line 6:
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
*[[Slashdot signatures]], rants condensed to 120 characters so it can be included in a tweet or a forum signature
+
*[[User:Tepples/Slashdot signatures|Slashdot signatures]], rants condensed to 120 characters to fit in a [[wikipedia:Twitter|tweet]] or a forum signature

Latest revision as of 18:16, 26 October 2013

The old RAnT page is available through the Wayback Machine. Damian Yerrick has been updating some of the arguments here to take into account more recent developments in technology and policy.

A lot of people on web forums hold common misconceptions. But when I answer them over and over, I get my posts voted down as redundant even though the misconception that I'm replying to isn't marked redundant. Mini-rants are short articles answering common misconceptions so that I can say it shorter with a link.

See also