Difference between revisions of "Category:Mini-rants"

From Pin Eight
Jump to: navigation, search
m (See also: number agreement: "rants" vs. "it")
m (See also: apparently we both forgot earlier that "redirects are dishonorable")
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
*[[Slashdot signatures]], rants condensed to 120 characters to fit in a [[wikipedia:Twitter|tweet]] or a forum signature
+
*[[User:Tepples/Slashdot signatures|Slashdot signatures]], rants condensed to 120 characters to fit in a [[wikipedia:Twitter|tweet]] or a forum signature

Revision as of 06:15, 27 January 2013

The old RAnT page is available through the Wayback Machine. Damian Yerrick has been updating some of the arguments here to take into account more recent developments in technology and policy.

A lot of people on web forums hold common misconceptions. But when I answer them over and over, I get my posts voted down as redundant even though the misconception that I'm replying to isn't marked redundant. Mini-rants are short articles answering common misconceptions so that I can say it shorter with a link.

See also