Difference between revisions of "Category:Mini-rants"

From Pin Eight
Jump to: navigation, search
(link back to the archived version of this page)
(disclaimer - sorry I forgot to include this)
Line 1: Line 1:
''If you were looking for the old RAnT page, see [http://web.archive.org/web/20080203111050/www.pineight.com/rant/ here (Wayback Machine)] or [[User:Eighty5cacao/misc/Old RAnT|here]].''
+
''If you were looking for the old RAnT page, see [http://web.archive.org/web/20080203111050/www.pineight.com/rant/ here (Wayback Machine)] or [[User:Eighty5cacao/misc/Old RAnT|here]]. Please be aware that the contents of that page may no longer represent Damian Yerrick's current opinions.''
  
  

Revision as of 17:01, 27 September 2010

If you were looking for the old RAnT page, see here (Wayback Machine) or here. Please be aware that the contents of that page may no longer represent Damian Yerrick's current opinions.


A lot of people on web forums hold common misconceptions. But when I answer them over and over, I get my posts voted down as redundant even though the misconception that I'm replying to isn't marked redundant. Mini-rants are short articles answering common misconceptions so that I can say it shorter with a link.

See also

  • Slashdot signatures, rants condensed to 120 characters so it can be included in a tweet or a forum signature